The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the importance of accurate language in media reporting, particularly in the context of legal terminology and its implications for public perception and criticism of Israel. The tone is corrective and aims to clarify the importance of using precise language to maintain credibility and accuracy in public discussions.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for accuracy in language, which can prevent misinformation and its potential harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by emphasizing the importance of correct terminology, which can foster clearer communication and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a misunderstanding without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to advocate for accuracy and integrity in media reporting. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.