The statement expresses a critical stance towards the concept of a 'hard party' and 'official truth' as described in the essay, drawing a parallel to the CCP in China. It suggests skepticism towards centralized political control and enforced ideology.
- The statement does not directly harm but uses a dismissive tone towards the idea of a 'hard party.'Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but uses a critical tone towards the CCP, which could be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes skepticism rather than understanding, focusing on criticism of centralized control. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism of the idea without personal attacks, focusing on the concept rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.