Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement addresses a public issue related to media consumption and political discourse, specifically focusing on the interaction between right-wing audiences and mainstream media (MSM). The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive of the right-wing cycle of questioning media coverage, suggesting a divide in media consumption habits and perceptions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a dismissive tone that could contribute to polarization. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it generalizes a group, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the concerns of a particular group without engaging with them constructively. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes a generalized critique of a group, which could be seen as a form of personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive, as it could exacerbate divisions. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.