Marianne Williamson

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
1/1/2026, 1:29:22 AM
X
In reply to:
Dr. Asip
@Asipofpiss
·
16d
@marwilliamson It's the world's oldest consensus. Are you talking about the God that was killed in the Gospels? Who did that?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
16d
@Asipofpiss The antisemitism people such as you so unabashedly articulate today is an ancient malfunction. Historically it's never far from the surface, and those intent on bringing it up right now will not prevail. I have faith in the decency of humanity and the Love of God to override it.
Dr. Asip
@Asipofpiss
·
16d
@marwilliamson She was a Jew and that essay was self aggrandizing trash in the face of the slaughter of children in Palestine.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
17d
Tatiana Schlossberg said in her essay that she regretted not having the chance to give more to the world. In fact, with her essay she gave so much. It was a masterwork.
She touched many, many hearts. She will be remembered by many and may her memory be a blessing.
CNN Breaking News
@cnnbrk
·
17d
Tatiana Schlossberg, environmental journalist and granddaughter of President John F. Kennedy, dies at 35
https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/30/p…

The statement 'It's not a consensus. It's a sickness.' is part of a broader conversation that touches on sensitive topics such as antisemitism and the interpretation of historical and religious events. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, suggesting a strong disagreement with the previous statement about antisemitism being an ancient malfunction. The intent appears to be to challenge the notion of consensus on this issue, but it does so in a way that could be perceived as inflammatory.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses the term 'sickness' in a way that could be seen as derogatory and dismissive, potentially causing harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in a dismissive and potentially inflammatory manner, which could be interpreted as a form of verbal aggression. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the previous argument without offering a constructive or empathetic perspective. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a dismissive tone rather than engaging with the argument in a reasoned manner. [-2]