Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques the actions of the US Department of Defense and the White House in the context of US/Ukraine/Russia negotiations, while praising the CIA for its support of Ukraine. It engages with public issues related to international relations and government actions, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('blundered repeatedly' and 'behaved disgracefully') which could be seen as harsh criticism. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on assigning blame and praise rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of government entities but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on government actions, potentially contributing to societal betterment by holding entities accountable. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint on public issues, maintaining integrity in its critique. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.