Jill Stien

The statement criticizes Trump's foreign policy, particularly regarding Iran and Palestine, and accuses him of hypocrisy. It suggests that his actions contradict his stated concern for human rights. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to highlight perceived inconsistencies in policy.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight perceived harm in foreign policy decisions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm, but does so in a confrontational manner. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes public figures' actions, which is generally acceptable in public discourse.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement seeks to promote understanding of perceived policy contradictions, though it does so in a critical tone.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of public figures' policies, which is a form of constructive criticism, though it lacks a conciliatory tone. [-1]