Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critical commentary on media coverage and political actions related to the conflict in Gaza, specifically addressing the perceived indifference to Palestinian casualties and the political relationship between Netanyahu and Trump. The tone is accusatory and charged, using strong language such as 'genocidal' and 'Dictator' to describe political figures.
- The statement uses inflammatory language that could contribute to harm by escalating tensions and promoting divisive rhetoric, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of terms like 'genocidal' and 'Dictator' can be seen as disrespectful and potentially defamatory, violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame and accusation rather than fostering dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against political figures. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to highlight an issue, but the approach may not contribute positively to societal betterment due to its divisive nature. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- While the statement exercises free speech, the responsibility and integrity of the platform are compromised by the use of inflammatory language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.