Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques the lack of transparency and communication from the US Southern Command (Southcom) regarding military operations, suggesting that Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) is taking the lead. It engages with public issues related to military transparency and accountability, especially in the context of significant geopolitical events involving Venezuela.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but criticizes the lack of information, which could imply a need for more responsible communication.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on institutional critique rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting a lack of transparency, which could encourage more open communication. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Southcom's communication practices without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By calling attention to a lack of transparency, the statement uses influence to potentially encourage better practices in military communication. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing a public institution's practices. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.