Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement reports on a covert CIA operation in Venezuela, which involves public issues related to international relations, national security, and sovereignty. It raises questions about the ethics and legality of such actions, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but the actions it describes could be seen as harmful to international relations and sovereignty. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not revealing sensitive personal information about individuals involved, but the operation itself may violate privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it reports on espionage activities without context or justification. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive criticism or dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about significant international actions, which can contribute to societal awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on government actions, but it should ensure accuracy and responsibility in its reporting. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.