The statement involves a discussion on the procedural aspects of military operations and the role of Congress, which is a public issue related to governance and national security. Rubio's comment suggests the impracticality of notifying Congress before certain missions, while Trump's comment implies a lack of trust in Congress's ability to keep information confidential.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a lack of trust in Congress, which could be seen as undermining institutional integrity.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of Congress. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does imply a general criticism of Congress's ability to handle sensitive information.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express opinions on governance, though it could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.