Jake Tapper

The statement by Pete Buttigieg addresses a public issue by critiquing the actions of a president in the context of foreign policy and domestic governance. It suggests that the president is using war as a distraction from domestic failures, which is a substantive engagement with public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as critical of the president's actions.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is critical of a public figure.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement aims to promote understanding of the potential motives behind political actions, though it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement is critical but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on actions and policies. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to critique and potentially improve public policy and governance. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to engage in political critique responsibly. [+1]