Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement provides a comparative analysis of military operations, focusing on the scale and sophistication of a recent raid compared to a historical event. It engages with public discourse by discussing military strategy and its evolution over time, which are relevant to public policy and international relations.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is a factual comparison of military operations.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does provide information that could contribute to a better understanding of military operations.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a factual comparison without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a discussion on military operations. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.