Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement and the referenced conversations engage in public discourse by discussing the implications of U.S. foreign policy decisions, particularly drone strikes and regime change, and their political ramifications. The tone is critical and seeks to highlight perceived inconsistencies in political actions and rhetoric.
- The statement and conversations do not directly cause harm but discuss actions that have caused harm, such as drone strikes. The tone is critical but not harmful in itself.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversations do not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but are critical of public figures and their policies.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement and conversations aim to promote understanding of political actions and their consequences, though they do so through a critical lens. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The conversations engage in criticism of political actions and policies, focusing on actions rather than personal attacks, though the tone is sharp. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The conversations uphold free speech by critically discussing public policies and actions, using the platform to question and analyze political decisions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.