In reply to:
The statement 'Children are running things' is a critical response to the original post by @WhiteHouse, which uses the acronym 'FAFO' (commonly understood as 'F*** Around and Find Out') alongside an image of a political figure. The reply implies a lack of maturity or competence in leadership. This exchange involves public figures and touches on political discourse, making it part of public discourse.
- The statement uses a metaphor to criticize leadership, which could be seen as a form of harm through derogatory language, though it is not overtly aggressive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of those it criticizes, as it implies incompetence in a dismissive manner. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead resorts to a personal attack, lacking substantive critique. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.