Jake Tapper

Rank 9 of 47

Score 106

Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅

So many ironies.

NYT, WaPo (and NPR and others) gave up Pentagon passes rather than sign a restrictive media policy that cast them as a security threat.

It didn’t stop them from learning critical information, which they handled responsibly as they so often have.

Max Tani

@maxwelltani

First in @semafor: NYT, WaPo learned of the secret US raid on Venezuela soon before it was scheduled to begin but held off publishing what they had at the administration's request to avoid endangering US troops

1/4/2026, 2:26:35 AM

The statement discusses the media's decision to withhold information about a US military operation at the administration's request, highlighting the balance between press freedom and national security. It acknowledges the media's responsible handling of sensitive information despite restrictive policies.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement suggests that the media acted responsibly to avoid harm by withholding information that could endanger troops. [+2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It respects the privacy and dignity of those involved by not disclosing sensitive details prematurely. [+2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding of the media's role in balancing public interest with security concerns. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
It uses the platform to highlight the media's responsible actions, potentially contributing to societal betterment by fostering trust in journalism. [+1]