Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement provides a historical list of US regime change efforts in Latin America, which engages with public issues related to foreign policy and historical analysis. It aims to inform or remind the audience of past US interventions, potentially prompting reflection or discussion on the implications of these actions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as critical of US actions, which may be uncomfortable for some.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it could encourage reflection on historical actions and their impacts.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- By highlighting historical interventions, the statement could contribute to a broader understanding of foreign policy, potentially influencing public opinion or policy discussions. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by presenting historical facts, using the platform to inform and potentially spark dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.