Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a strong critique of U.S. foreign policy, particularly in relation to Venezuela, and suggests a conspiracy involving the U.S. and Israel. It uses charged language and makes serious accusations, which contributes to public discourse by engaging with international relations and foreign policy issues.
- The statement uses inflammatory language that could incite harm or hostility, violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement could be seen as engaging in hate speech by attributing violent intentions to a specific group, violating the principle of respecting dignity and avoiding hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses divisive and accusatory language. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks and broad accusations. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or with integrity, given the lack of evidence and inflammatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.