Richard Medhurst
@richimedhurst
·
22d
The statement criticizes past actions by Hillary Clinton and implies ongoing atrocities by the U.S. It references a controversial quote and suggests a pattern of behavior by the U.S. government. The accompanying conversation discusses potential war crimes, adding to the critique of U.S. actions.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of individuals involved, particularly by using the term 'ghoulish giggles.'Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on condemnation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on past actions without suggesting solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.