Jill Stien

The statement reports on a protest against a political action, indicating public engagement with international policy issues. The tone is assertive, suggesting opposition to a specific policy attributed to a political figure.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as polarizing due to its strong opposition stance.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding of public sentiment against a policy, but lacks empathy towards differing views.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not facilitate constructive dialogue either. [-1]