Jill Stien

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -112

The statement is a critique of U.S. foreign policy, suggesting that the U.S. is a major source of global violence and instability. It references historical and current events to argue that U.S. actions are detrimental to global peace.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as harmful by those who view it as an unfair characterization of a nation, potentially inciting negative sentiments. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does make strong accusations against a nation, which could be seen as disrespectful to its citizens. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging complexities. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it makes broad accusations without inviting discussion or considering opposing views. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight perceived injustices, aiming to raise awareness about global issues. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech to critique government actions, but the tone may not be seen as responsible or constructive.