Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -109

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by discussing U.S. foreign policy and public opinion regarding Venezuela. The statement suggests a negative trend in public approval of the U.S. handling of Venezuela, implying criticism of the policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of a policy, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on disapproval and a negative forecast without providing context or solutions. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not attack individuals personally, maintaining a focus on policy. [+1]