Michael Schellenberger

The statement and conversation involve public discourse as they address U.S. foreign policy and public opinion on intervention in Venezuela. The initial statement uses alarmist symbols (🚨⚠️💀) which may imply urgency or danger, potentially influencing public perception.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The use of alarmist symbols could be seen as potentially harmful by inciting fear or panic, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the tone could be seen as disrespectful to those involved in the policy discussion.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses symbols to convey a negative sentiment without providing constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement lacks constructive criticism and instead uses symbols to express disapproval, which does not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]