Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement criticizes the Pentagon's press corps, suggesting it was designed to suppress important stories by replacing nonpartisan outlets with friendly media. The tone is critical and implies a lack of transparency and accountability in the Pentagon's media relations.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies harm through lack of transparency.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on institutional critique rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of media manipulation, though it could be more empathetic.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the Pentagon's press strategy, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight potential issues in media transparency, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by critiquing media practices responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.