Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement reflects on media bias and the complexities of foreign intervention, suggesting a shift towards a more critical and cautious approach. It critiques past actions and implies a need for change in media practices.
- The statement aims to do no harm by advocating for a more thoughtful approach to foreign intervention. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by acknowledging the complexities and historical failures of interventions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engages in constructive criticism of media practices without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.