Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement reports on a discussion involving U.S. President Donald Trump and his team about acquiring Greenland and potentially using the U.S. military to achieve this goal. This constitutes public discourse as it involves a significant geopolitical issue and potential policy action that could impact international relations and national security.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the implications of military use could be harmful, which is not addressed in the statement. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a straightforward report without context or explanation.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not explicitly use influence for societal betterment, as it reports on a controversial geopolitical strategy without discussing potential benefits or drawbacks.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on governmental discussions, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform are not evaluated in the statement. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.