Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement is a strong critique of law enforcement actions in Minnesota, accusing them of excessive force and calling for accountability. It uses charged language, comparing the situation to actions by 'fascist regimes,' and demands a full investigation. The statement aims to hold public officials accountable and seeks to address concerns about civil rights and law enforcement practices.
- The statement aims to highlight harm caused by law enforcement, aligning with the principle of doing no harm, but the use of charged language could escalate tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially undermining dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The call for investigation promotes accountability and understanding, but the tone may not foster empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of public officials, which is constructive, but the language could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.