Vivek Ramaswamy

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 45

The statement critiques the justification for property tax increases by highlighting a perceived discrepancy between increased spending per student and declining educational performance. It questions the effectiveness of current funding strategies for public schools.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about public spending, which can be seen as an attempt to hold authorities accountable, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for effective use of taxpayer money. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By questioning the effectiveness of increased spending, the statement could promote understanding and dialogue about educational funding and performance. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the rationale behind tax increases, though it could be more effective if it offered solutions or alternatives.