Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a public issue by discussing an incident involving ICE and calls for accountability and policy change, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is urgent and critical, aiming to highlight perceived injustices and advocate for the abolition of ICE.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but uses strong language to call for action, which could be seen as inflammatory.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does strongly criticize ICE as an institution.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards ICE, focusing instead on accountability and abolition. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not invite dialogue or constructive criticism, focusing on a strong stance against ICE. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal change by calling for the abolition of ICE. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to address a public issue, using the platform to call for policy change. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.