In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
15d
The statement discusses the influence of the EU's Digital Markets Act on global legislation, particularly in Brazil, and responds to a claim about censorship motives behind new social media regulations. It engages in public discourse by addressing international policy and regulatory impacts.
- The statement does not directly harm but could be seen as countering a narrative of harm by suggesting a positive influence of the EU's legislation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by providing an alternative perspective on the intent behind the legislation, focusing on competition rather than censorship. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific claim and providing a counterpoint without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.