Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -109
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing the contentious issue of parental rights and government intervention in cases involving transgender youth. The tone is alarmist and critical, suggesting that government actions are harmful and overreaching.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses hyperbolic language, which may contribute to fear and misunderstanding, potentially causing harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of those involved, as it discusses sensitive personal matters publicly. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The language used does not promote understanding or empathy, instead framing the issue in a confrontational manner. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead using inflammatory language that may hinder productive discussion. [-2]