Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement reflects a public figure's perspective on the limits of their power, touching on significant public issues such as international law and governance. The tone suggests a dismissal of external checks on power, emphasizing personal morality as the sole constraint.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies a potential disregard for international norms, which could indirectly lead to harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it centers on personal authority over collective norms. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it dismisses international law without engaging with its merits. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to assert personal power over international norms, which may not align with societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but raises concerns about responsible use of influence, given the dismissal of international law. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.