In reply to:
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
·
12d
The statement is a reaction to a conversation about a public issue, specifically the critique of Special Counsel Jack Smith's case by a major publication. It involves public figures and a significant legal and political matter, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('blowtorch') which could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more celebratory of a critique.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a reaction to an existing critique. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a critique of a public issue, which could be seen as contributing to public discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to share a viewpoint on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.