Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
Victoria J. Taylor
@VictoriaT_
·
16d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the U.S. government's decision to cut funding for VPNs and internet circumvention tools, which are relevant to the ongoing issue of internet access in Iran during protests. It critiques past policy decisions and suggests a course of action to address a public concern.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on policy critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the importance of VPNs for internet access in Iran. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of U.S. government policy without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for policy changes that could benefit society by improving internet access in Iran. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to discuss and critique government policy. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.