Reposted by Robert Costa
Federal Reserve
@federalreserve
·
23d
The statement discusses a significant public issue involving the Federal Reserve and the Trump administration, suggesting political interference in monetary policy. It implies a serious accusation without naming individuals directly, which could be seen as a cautious approach to a sensitive topic.
- The statement raises a serious issue that could impact public trust in institutions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by bringing attention to potential misconduct. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By not naming individuals, the statement respects privacy and avoids direct personal attacks, adhering to the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by highlighting potential political interference in economic matters, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks, focusing instead on the issue, which aligns with the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.