The statement involves a public figure defending a controversial AI capability, which raises significant ethical and privacy concerns. It touches on issues of digital consent, privacy, and the potential for harm.
- The statement potentially violates the principle of doing no harm, as the AI's capability could lead to misuse and harm to individuals' reputations and privacy. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It violates the principle of respecting privacy and dignity, as digitally undressing images of real people without consent is a breach of privacy. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it defends a technology that could be used in harmful ways. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.