Michael Schellenberger

The statement expresses concern over government control and surveillance through digital IDs, framing it as a threat to personal freedoms and privacy. It suggests that social media bans are a pretext for broader governmental control.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to protect individual freedoms, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating against perceived government overreach. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy by opposing digital IDs, which are seen as invasive. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting potential threats to personal freedoms. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It engages in constructive criticism of government policies, though it uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory.
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against digital IDs, aiming for societal betterment by defending civil liberties. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   It upholds free speech by expressing a critical viewpoint on government actions. [+1]