Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of ICE recruitment practices and the implications of minimal screening. The tone is critical and challenges the official narrative provided by DHS.
- The statement questions the integrity of ICE's hiring process, potentially highlighting harm caused by inadequate screening. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but challenges the dignity of the hiring process, suggesting it is flawed.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness of potential issues within ICE recruitment. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of ICE's practices, but it does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.