Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
+5
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue involving a search warrant executed at a journalist's home, which raises concerns about press freedom and privacy. The statement expresses support for a colleague, which can be seen as a response to a public concern about journalistic integrity and freedom.
- The statement does no harm and is supportive, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the colleague by expressing support without revealing private details. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by showing solidarity with a colleague under scrutiny. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement uses influence to support a colleague, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by advocating for press freedom. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to support a colleague. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.