The statement uses a Mark Twain quote to imply that speaking less might be wiser, potentially critiquing the number of words spoken by a Supreme Court justice. The tone is humorous but could be interpreted as dismissive or critical of the justice's verbosity.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement could be seen as causing harm by mocking or belittling the justice's contributions.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It may not fully respect the dignity of the justice by implying their words are foolish.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses humor to critique.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack.
[-1]