The statement by @JamesEsses engages in public discourse as it addresses the societal issue of language and identity labels, specifically the use of the term 'cis' in gender discussions. The tone is assertive and dismissive, suggesting that the term 'cis' is a negative label or slur.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by dismissing a term that many use to describe their gender identity, potentially invalidating their experiences. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By labeling 'cis' as a slur, the statement could be interpreted as disrespectful to those who identify with or use the term, potentially bordering on hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses a term used in gender discourse without engaging in a constructive explanation or dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it labels the term as propaganda without providing a rationale or engaging with differing viewpoints. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity by dismissing a widely used term without constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.