Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the societal issue of healthcare access and government spending priorities. It critiques the allocation of funds to foreign aid versus domestic healthcare needs, highlighting a perceived misalignment in government priorities.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as critical of government actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of government spending priorities, though it may lack empathy towards differing perspectives. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques policy decisions, aligning with constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a societal issue, aiming to influence public opinion on government spending priorities. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a public concern, though it could be more balanced in its presentation.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.