In reply to:
Alana Stewart
@AlanaKStewart
·
23d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of ICE abductions and the broader context of protests and law enforcement actions. It is part of a conversation involving public figures discussing the conduct of protests and law enforcement responses, which are significant public issues.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights a contentious issue, which could be seen as promoting awareness. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by drawing attention to a specific issue, though it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is part of a dialogue but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By highlighting a public issue, the statement uses influence to potentially contribute to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by engaging in a public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.