Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement addresses a public issue concerning the actions of ICE agents and their adherence to DHS policy, specifically regarding the use of force and de-escalation tactics. It critiques the decision-making process and suggests that the outcome could have been different if proper procedures were followed.
- The statement implies that harm could have been avoided by following proper procedures, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By highlighting the importance of de-escalation and verbal warnings, the statement promotes understanding and empathy in handling such situations. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of ICE agents' actions without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on policy adherence instead. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for better practices within law enforcement, aiming for societal improvement. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to critique and suggest improvements in public policy. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.