Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a critique of a policy decision by a public figure, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is cautious and focuses on the method rather than the goal of the policy.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on policy critique. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the method rather than attacking the individual. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.