Jake Tapper

The statement appears to be a report on a letter from a public figure (President Trump) to another public figure (Jonas Gahr Støre), mentioning the Nobel Prize and Greenland, and involving diplomatic communication. It suggests a substantive engagement with public issues, such as international relations and diplomacy, which constitutes public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but the content it reports on could potentially involve threats, which would violate this principle. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy by not disclosing the full content of the letter, but it does mention obtaining the text from officials, which could raise privacy concerns. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on reporting a potentially contentious diplomatic issue.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not facilitate constructive dialogue either.
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes in the statement.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to inform the public about a significant diplomatic issue, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by reporting on a matter of public interest, but the responsibility and integrity of the reporting depend on the accuracy and context provided. [+1]