Jake Tapper

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the language used by a political figure and its potential implications if used by the opposing party. It highlights the divisive language in political rhetoric.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement indirectly critiques the use of derogatory language, which can be harmful and divisive. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy but highlights a public figure's language, which is part of public accountability.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on hypothetical reactions rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It engages in criticism of the language used but does not attack the individual personally. [+1]