Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement calls for a bipartisan congressional inquiry into presidential fitness, which is a substantive engagement with public issues, specifically concerning the actions and decisions of a sitting president. The tone is serious and suggests a concern for the implications of the president's actions on international relations and governance.
- The statement does not use harmful language but raises a concern about presidential actions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement calls for a bipartisan inquiry, which suggests a desire for constructive dialogue rather than personal attacks, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By calling for an inquiry, the statement uses influence to potentially address and improve governance, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly calling for an inquiry into a public issue, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.