Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques media priorities by contrasting a serious international issue with a lighter news story. It implies a misalignment in media focus, using sarcasm to highlight perceived triviality in coverage.
- The statement uses sarcasm but does not directly harm individuals.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It attempts to promote understanding by critiquing media focus, though it could be more constructive.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in critique without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.