Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement discusses a political issue involving the vetting process for potential vice-presidential candidates and their foreign ties, which is a matter of public concern and interest. It provides context for questions about foreign influence in politics, specifically regarding Tim Walz and Josh Shapiro.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it reports on a factual matter. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It reports on a public figure's vetting process, which is a legitimate public interest. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it provides information that could lead to a better understanding of the vetting process.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It presents information about a public figure's vetting process without making personal judgments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by reporting on a matter of public interest with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.