Secretary Kristi Noem
@Sec_Noem
·
20d
The statement is a critical response to a public figure's claim about law enforcement actions in Minneapolis. It challenges the accuracy and intent of the original statement, suggesting it is misleading and propagandistic.
- The statement accuses the original message of being full of lies and propaganda, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does use strong language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing the original message without offering constructive alternatives. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide evidence or engage in constructive dialogue, potentially violating the principle of constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement challenges the integrity of the original message, which is a form of exercising free speech, but it could be more responsible by providing evidence or a more balanced critique.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.